Are you a PERSON, or a Living Be-ing?

Posted: Sunday, July 25, 2010 in Born Without Money

Vic wrote, “We cannot apply for a drivers license as an example and not be subject to constitutional/governmental authority.”


Later he writes, “The Government cannot see or affect man, it sees names and names are persons as are men who act like they are subject to constitutional authority who by their own actions (voluntary ignorance) are identifying themselves as persons.”


Is not the name on the driver’s license of the person?  So then, how does Vic conclude that a connection is made between the driver’s license and Man created in the image and likeness of God, male and female?  His conclusion is by obtaining a driver license you voluntarily and automatically attached your Be-ing to becoming the PERSON.  Yes, this can happen and we have all experienced how this works, however does this have to be the way things work out?  Does this conclusion sound like the same kind of presumption that the agents/servants/trustee are working through?  Furthermore, why can you not also use a driver license, social security card, and other such documents created by Caesar/Government for the purpose to show that you are a “user,” of the NAME only, having no liability for it?


 

Since it is true that Government can only see Fictional Entities/PERSONS, (which is good) then how can the Government, all the sudden slam on the breaks, and draw a connection between a living Be-ing and a PERSON?  Certainly, THEY cannot!  Therefore, all connections can only be drawn by you or I, which I do believe Vic also references in this writing.  So then, I think the key word that is missing here is, “Indemnification.” We know that the driver license belongs to the Government/Caesar.  So if they ask for it, “GIVE,” it to them!  For the Sons and Heirs is exempt and can and does give, because the Son and Heir is the producer of all good things in His Dominion of which he is the ruler (Genesis 1:26-28).  In other words, the document will become whatever it needs to be, according to the USE you make of it.  It comes down to “how” you “use” the document, because how you use it, how you give it to them, will determine how it will be used either for you, or against you.


 

Now, look at the back of the Social Security Card.  It is written upon it, “This card belongs to the Social Security Administration and you must return it if we ask for it.” Since the Social Security Card produced by the Government is for the PERSON, is it not logical to conclude that the Driver License was also produced by the Government for the PERSON as well?  Does not the creator of a “thing/document/product,” also have the responsibility of liability of the thing they created?  How then can you and I, who are, “Living Be-ings,” have liability for a driver license?  Did we create it?  How can the Corporation/Government/Caesar evade and avoid the maxim of law of like kinds?  Only if they are given power and authority from above, which means, if they do it is because you gave them consent, and if they do not, it is because you did not consent to Be-ing recognized by the NAME and NUMBER that they are liable for, because they are the creator of it.


So then, if you see and know the truth of this matter then, “render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s,” and make absolutely sure that any of the agents of Caesar know that you are giving to them that which already belongs to them so that they, “be not offended.”

 

Vic wrote, “We cannot apply for a drivers license as an example and not be subject to constitutional/governmental authority.”


Later he writes, “The Government cannot see or affect man, it sees names and names are persons as are men who act like they are subject to constitutional authority who by their own actions (voluntary ignorance) are identifying themselves as persons.”

Is not the name on the driver’s license of the person?  So then, how does Vic conclude that some kind of connection can be made between the driver’s license and Man created in the image and likeness of God, male and female?  His conclusion is by obtaining a driver license you voluntarily and automatically attaches your Be-ing to becoming the PERSON.  Yes, this can happen and we have all experienced how this works, however does this have to be the way things work out?  Does this conclusion sound like the same kind of presumption that the agents/servants/trustee are working through?  Furthermore, why can you not also use a drivers license, social security card, and other such documents created by Caesar/Government for the purpose to show that you are a “user,” of the NAME only, having no liability for it?

Since it is true that Government can only see Fictional Entities/PERSONS, (which is good) then how can the Government, all of the sudden slam on the breaks, and draw a connection between a living Be-ing and a PERSON?  Certainly, THEY cannot!  Therefore, all connections can only be drawn by you or I, which I do believe Vic also references in this writing.  So then, I think the key word that is missing here is, “Indemnification.” We know that the driver license belongs to the Government/Caesar.  So if they ask for it, “GIVE,” it to them!  For the Sons and Heir is exempt and therefore can and does give, because the Son and Heir is the producer of all good things in His Dominion of which he is the ruler (Genesis 1:26-28).  In other words, the document will become whatever it needs to be, according to the USE you make of it.  It comes down to “how” you “use” the document, for how you use it; it will be returned unto you.

Now, look at the back of the Social Security Card.  It is written upon it, “This card belongs to the Social Security Administration and you must return it if we ask for it.” Since the Social Security Card was produced by the Government for the PERSON, is it not logical to conclude that the Driver License was also produced by the Government for the PERSON as well?  Does not the creator of a “thing/document/product,” also have the responsibility of liability of the thing they created?  How then can you and I, who are living Be-ings, have liability for a driver license?  Did we create it?  How can the Corporation/Government/Caesar evade and avoid the maxim of law of like kinds?  Only if they are given power and authority from above, which means, if they do it is because you gave them consent, and if not, it is because you did not consent to Be-ing recognized by the NAME and NUMBER that they are liable for, because they are the creator of it.

So then, if you see and know the truth of this matter then, “render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s,” and make absolutely sure that any of the agents of Caesar know that you are giving to them that which already belongs to them so that they, “be not offended.”

Advertisements

Comments are closed.