Landmark Decision is OLD NEWS, for the issue has already been decided

Posted: Sunday, January 23, 2011 in THE GIFT OF MY EPISTLE
Unlike the flavor of the news story below, the decision that governed this legal position, was actually made over 150 years ago.  This is nothing new!  The opinion was given in the Padelford Fay & Co. v. Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah, which stated, No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it.” 14 Ga. 438, 1854 WL 1492 (Ga., Jan Term 1854) (NO. 64).  Now you know what all the Justices/Judges have been doing; simply following this opinion/decision.
So then, the story below IS NOT shocking news, nor need it be UPSETTING in any form!  However, what this article actually IS doing, is restating, for public notice, what has already been concluded to be valid public policy, as quoted above.  Therefore, all this news story is doing, is giving a chance for those that are unaware of this knowledge, to become aware of this knowledge.  The question is, how many people do you think will read this story and ask an appropriate question for themselves so that the truth is revealed to them?  He who has an ear… let them hear!  Fear not, for this  knowledge will not, and does not, hurt or harm anyone!  Quite the contrary actually.  This information can help if one is willing to search out the truth to this matter for themselves, as in being a good Berean.
One other minor point… this refers to all three (3) Constitutions, if you know what I mean.

So then, why did these judges do this to Windsor?  Because he was acting on behalf of the NAME.  Property of the STATE which he does not own.  He was putting in paperwork for the NAME and telling them what to do with their property.  Make no mistake about this… this is an act of war by a belligerent hostile who is acting as if he is the owner.  Therefore, since he is acting as such, he then incurs the liability associated with such actions.  This maybe very hard for some of you to comprehend but, the real shock in this story is, the Judges DID NOT make the wrong decision.  They were absolutely correct!

So then, consider this point while reading the story below.  That Windsor is ignorant of what the real issue is having to do with the NAME, and is therefore causing the controversy by dictating to the owners of the NAME, what to do with the NAME.  Furthermore, who is actually the one that appears to be accusing their Brother and why isn’t there any forgiveness?

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision:

Constitution is Void

PR Newswire

Tue Jan 18, 3:56 pm ET
ATLANTA, Jan. 18, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms.  The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690).  One word decisions: DENIED!

Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

“There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter.  These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons.  Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case.  The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court.”

The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

“Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts.”

By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

William M. Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006.  Windsor was named a defendant in a civil lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery.  Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore.  Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, 32-year federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay a fortune in legal fees of Maid of the Mist.  Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans’ ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

After attempting to get the case reopened with new evidence that proved fraud upon the courts and obstruction of justice, Judge Evans and Judge William S. Duffey committed a variety of crimes and violations of Constitutional rights, as did judges with the Eleventh Circuit.  All of this was detailed for the Supreme Court.

Windsor says: “I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges.  I have been contacted by people from all over the country and around the world with their stories of judicial corruption with judges all over the U.S.

“My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney’s Office, the FBI, and Congress. I do not believe there is a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts.  In my opinion, we now live in a police state.  Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want.  Our laws are meaningless.  Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

“In my opinion, this is the most serious issue that our country has ever faced.  Our rights have been stolen.  And the mainstream media refuses to cover this story because they are afraid of the judges.  Heaven help us.

“I believe our only hope in America is if the masses become aware of what is taking place.  I am writing an expose, and my book will be available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and on soon.  The publisher will decide if the title is Lawless America or Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed.”


Comments are closed.