The Purpose for the Birth Certficate is INDEMNIFICATION!

Posted: Thursday, March 24, 2011 in Born Without Money

The photo copy of the letter below is from, “The Michigan Department of Community Health, Division for Vital Records.”  Below that is the text that was communicated in that letter.  I AM going to take you through some extremely important information regard the Birth Certificate and/or the Certificate of Live Birth.  My purpose and intent is to reveal to you, if you not already aware, the true nature of these two documents/instruments, and how they are properly to be used.  If you have never heard of this before, then I encourage you to give yourself a chance to seek out the truth to these things, and always-always-always, do your own research and discovery, which is what some others call, “due diligence.”

 

The text of the letter above reads as follows:

The Michigan Department of Community Health, Division for Vital Records, is in receipt of your letter with the questions regarding your birth record.

The Certificate of Live Birth is not intended to be used for identification purposes.  However, it is a document that is needed to obtain an identification such as a driver’s license, state-issued photo identification or a passport. The birth certificate is a very valuable document and should always be kept in a safe, secure place.

The original birth records of all persons born in the State of Michigan are housed in the state repository for safekeeping. By law, the original certificate must remain under the care of the State of Michigan Vital Records office; however, we Issue certified copies with a raised seal that can be used for any legal purpose.”

 

Yes, the letter is interesting to say the least, and you are correct about what appears to be a contradiction according to the current knowledge that we are of the opinion of, at the present moment.  The letter does indirectly suggest that we are being made a, counter offer,” to use the DRIVER’S LICENSE, STATE ID, and/or PASSPORT, in place of using the indemnification powers of the Certificate of Live Birth, because the Certificate of Live Birth becomes shielded behind the aforementioned inferior foreign documents, and is not seen by the public officer asking for one of the inferior foreign documents, except for the one at the DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, or PASSPORT OFFICE, but then again, they too are also unaware of what is actually taking place.  So then, this is how the DRIVER/CITIZEN can become the surety and trustee through assumption which forms an implied trust, and therefore the holder and users of such a document is considered being the one to perform the fiduciary duties to settle whatever the issues arise.  This basically amounts to the selling of our own inheritance/indemnification for a bowl of soup.

 

It is interesting to note that any document that has a signature placed upon it, thereby becomes a, “negotiable instrument.”  So then, the Registrar has given to the receiver of a copy of the Birth Certificate, a negotiable instrument, eh?  Does this help to clarify that we negotiated for another document/instrument of a lesser value/nature?  Perhaps of a, “sin-nature,” by us putting a “si(n)ature”/signature to it by “signing,” or “sinning?”  Notice that the “g” in sign is silent, but is not in signature.  It points to the “g” being used to alter the sound, but leaving intact the original meaning and purpose.  In other words, the “g” is just there as a distraction.  Just like the silent “e” is unnecessary in so many words, so also is any other letter that is silent.


Now, before I continue I want to point out something very important so you know why it is that I refer to the Certificate of Live Birth/Certificate of Birth/Statement of Birth/Record of Birth as an, “Instrument,” firstly, and a document in the secondary.  Know ye this, everything… and I mean absolutely everything that has a signature that is placed upon it, is become a, “negotiable instrument,” and that is one of the key pieces of knowledge to unraveling the truth purpose and intent for the Certificate of Live Birth.

 

In concert with this, I would like to point out that the sentence, “The Certificate of Live Birth is not intended to be used for identification purposes,” does not directly indicate that it cannot be used for identification purposes; and furthermore, that it will never be accepted, if it is used for just such a purpose, because it is not explicitly forbidden by their statutes and codes, is it?  Therefore, it can be used for that purpose, can it not?  The wording of the letter uses the word, “intended,” to form the thought that using it for identification is not a good idea, but it does not state that it is either unlawful or illegal in any way, and I think that is a key.  I AM not aware of any statute(s) or, code(s) that forbids using it for this purpose.  Is there one?

 

As I believe that identity is key and core to everything, I also believe this key is related to that, which also directly relates to the verse that says it is the lawyers/attorneys that, “…do not enter into and prevent others from entering into,” this key of knowledge, because by not revealing the true purpose of the instrument/document, which is to protect identity from identification, because these are of two different worlds, then the lawyers/attorneys are directly preventing the knowledge of proper usage, which is for the purpose of indemnification, which then keeps the, “Security of the PERSON,” safe from harm, by not attaching identity to identification.  Through the continued success of preventing this key of knowledge from being made known, lawyers/attorneys can orchestrate personal gain at the loss of others by and through their lack of knowledge, and as a result, directly increase their take/payday/earnings, by not entering into this and preventing others.  So then, this reveals the motive for a fraud, does it not?  After all, there is a maxim of law that states that fraud is hidden within generalities, and all the knowledge that is given concerning this document/instrument is nothing but generalities, which in turn reveals that somebody does not want people to see and know what the true “intended” purpose and use of the Certificate of Live Birth actually is, INDEMNIFICATION!

 

Since I AM now in possession of, “Authenticated copies of Certified Certificates of Live Birth,” I AM of the current opinion that the Certificate of Live Birth IS the correct document to use for ALL identification purposes, and is a more better instrument (as in a more better covenant) to use than a STATE ID, DRIVER LICENSE, or even a PASSPORT, with one exception! The green cover non-citizen national passport, not the standard blue UNITED STATES one that is issued to citizens of the UNITED STATES who have sworn an oath to the corporation, but that is topic for another day.

 

When the Certificate of Live Birth is used for its proper purpose, indemnification is automatically inherent because that is the true purpose of this instrument/document. It keeps the woe away from the man ((wo)man), and out of the commercial world and safe from causing harm, and being harmed, which allows the man through his indemnification to accept all things as being good, and allow for settlement in peace as a peaceful inhabitant.

 

As a metaphorical example, think of what an electrical circuit is in your house.  All the outlets in one room are all connected in series to each other, which is then connected to the main line in the electrical box where the power comes from.  We are the “switch” through which that power flows, or the current/currency flows. The circuit is not complete without Us, or without our power and authority (permission) empowering the circuit, for every circuit needs a switch or else there will be major problems.  By this example, you could say our power and authority is manifested through our “consent” either implied or expressed, and hopefully expressed more than implied, because one is of competence and the other more of ignorance.  Nevertheless, we are the only ones that can flip the switch.  No one else can.

 

Using the Certificate of Live Birth this way also clearly proclaims, “The NAME is not me,” and that, “I do not consent to be recognized by that NAME,” and furthermore, “I AM not the creator or owner of that Corporation of which somebody has brought charges against.”  All of this can be accomplished without ever having to speak a word as you have experienced.  Of course speaking this is always a good thing because  we know, “…our word is our bond,” and when we speak, we bind things on earth as it is in heaven, so also can we loose/unbind things, which is to say, “Correct the MISTAKE,” correct? But just as your own personal firsthand experience proved that it is not necessary to speak, because when you could not speak the day you went into Court, the documents basically did all the speaking for the PERSON/FICTION/CORPORATION, which makes complete sense.  The indemnification certificate, “The Certificate of Live Birth,” opened the door for settlement without you ever having to directly enter into the world of commerce.  So then, giving the one bringing the charge a copy of the Indemnification Certificate/Certificate of Live Birth is the proper notice of documentation of who the PERSON/FICTION/CORPORATION actually is, and therefore is the instrument for settlement for all issues involving the PERSON/FICTION/CORPORATION.

 

In addition, the letter points out that the, “birth certificate is a very valuable document,” but does not include the, “Certificate of Live Birth,” in that conclusion.  So then, the question, “Is that true?”  Is the Certificate of Live Birth considered not to be valuable because it was not included in the statement, “very valuable document (instrument) should always be kept in a safe, secure place?” This statement opens the door to a whole bunch of other questions because they, the STATE of WHATEVER, is suggesting that they are the only ones that can keep the original safe and secure.  Does this make you wonder why they would say this?  Is this really true, or do they have another motivation for making this statement?  However, for now, this is a bit off the direction of this article, but it is worth pondering.

 

So then, if the Birth Certificate is a, “very valuable document (instrument),” how can an exact copy, certified or not, not be valuable, or at least as valuable?  I believe it is very possible that there is an attempt at deception concerning this issue, because these two instruments/documents are only different from one very small aspect.  One is the original, and other is a certified image and likeness of the original.  That is all the difference is!  The copy/image/likeness is certified to be the same as the original.  The “Certificate of Live Birth,” is an, “image and likeness,” (Where have we read this phrase before?) of the, “Birth Certificate,” which of course, is the original.

 

So then, since the image and likeness cannot exist without the original, why have they attempted to persuade the receiver of an image and likeness-copy of a certified instrument/document to devalue it, or consider the image and likeness-copy of it, to be worthless, or of having no value?  Does there appear to be a deception, or at least, an ulterior motive to cover up its true value and purpose?

 

Nevertheless, how is it possible that the value of the image and likeness-copy is separate or if any different from the original since it is a certified copy of the original?  How can the value of the image and likeness not be as valuable is the original?  Some might say, “Because it is not the original,” but then again, if the image and likeness-copy is certified to be the same as the original, this would imply that it does have the same value, or at least, a high percentage of the same value.  This certainly does make sense, especially in light of the fact that the STATE of WHATEVER can, “issue certified copies with a raise seal that can be used for ANY LEGAL PURPOSE,” which clearly expresses it can be used for any purpose that involves the commercial world of commerce.

 

The last few sentences of this letter that I wanted to look at is first, “However, it is a document that is needed to obtain an identification such as a driver’s license, state-issued photo identification or a passport.” Nowhere within this letter does it state that the identification document that is obtained is YOURS, or that it even belongs to you.  I guess that is why they call this, “reading in between the lines,” because what it does not say, says an awful lot.

 

“The original birth records of all persons born,” is quite humorous, because a person is never born but birthed or berthed just like the vessel, it is, and since it is only a fiction and a corporation at that, it could never have been born.

 

“By law, the original certificate must remain under the care of the STATE OF MICHIGAN Vital Records office.” Exactly what law is this?  Does this refer to a statute or does this refer to the law of the trust when the Registrar was intrusted with the original?

 

So then, how much value does a Certificate of Live Birth have?  As much as you can imagine, I would imagine, which could only be limited by a mind that is limited.  The original Birth Certificate is the, “lawful document,” which is also a negotiable instrument and security for all images and likeness-copies which are, “legal extracts,” which is why these can be certified and authenticated, and then be used for indemnification purposes, which is superior to identification, and is accepted as being the original.  It could be said that the one is the right hand, and the other is the left hand, and both of course, are connected to the one original source, the living, moving, breathing, blood flowing, Be-ing, but NOT in a direct way, for that would violate a certain Maxim of Law that we are all very familiar with, which speaks plainly to the truth that, “unequal things cannot be compared.”


 

 

 


Yes, the letter is interesting to say the least, and you are correct about what appears to be a contradiction according to the current knowledge that we are of the opinion of, at the present moment.  The letter does indirectly suggest that we are being made a, counter offer,” to use the DRIVER’S LICENSE, STATE ID, and/or PASSPORT, in place of using the indemnification powers of the Certificate of Live Birth, because the Certificate of Live Birth becomes shielded behind the aforementioned inferior foreign documents, and is not seen by the public officer asking for one of the inferior foreign documents, except for the one at the DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, or PASSPORT OFFICE, but then again, they too are also unaware of what is actually taking place.  So then, this is how the DRIVER/CITIZEN can become the surety and trustee through assumption which forms an implied trust, and therefore the holder and users of such a document is considered being the one to perform the fiduciary duties to settle whatever the issues arise.  This basically amounts to the selling of our own inheritance/indemnification for a bowl of soup.

Now, before I continue I want to point out something very important so you know why it is that I refer to the Certificate of Live Birth/Certificate of Birth/Statement of Birth/Record of Birth as an, “Instrument,” firstly, and a document in the secondary.  Know ye this, everything… and I mean absolutely everything that has a signature that is placed upon it, is become a, “negotiable instrument,” and that is one of the key pieces of knowledge to unraveling the truth purpose and intent for the Certificate of Live Birth.

Advertisements

Comments are closed.