EQUITY IS THE WILL OF THE FATHER AND THE WAY OF INHERITANCE FOR THE HEIR

Posted: Monday, May 15, 2017 in Born Without Money
From Noah Websters 1828 Dictionary
WORD OF THE DAY: UNRIGHTEOUSNESS
 
UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, noun unri’chusness.
1. Injustice; a violation of the divine law, or of the plain principles of justice and equity; wickedness. unrighteousness may consist of a single unjust act, but more generally, when applied to persons, it denotes an habitual course of wickedness.
 
Romans 1:29.
2 Corinthians 6:14.
Did you notice, “…Plain principles of justice and (especially) equity?”
That should have jumped of the page at you!
 
Every transgression of the law is unrighteousness.

Why?

Because, the law given because of transgressions.

Why?

Because, the people needed NEGATIVE EQUITY to learn and discern what Equity truly IS all about.

074 | Equity IS the Will of the Father

Were you aware of that? Unfortunately, the reading of many posts from other reveals that most of you are not. For you have bound yourselves voluntarily to pursuing what you desire thru some form of law. This is why you are still traversing into their administrative courts. Make no mistake about this,… this act is of utter foolishness. No Son and Heir of the Most High Creator God and Father ever needs to voluntarily make themselves present in such a venue and thereby automatically volunteer by that act and deed to be a surety for someone else debts. But, some of you will still do so any way, and even worse, maybe waste five or six years of your life and time only to end up loosing in the end.
 
Nevertheless, some of you are very-very proud of that kind of action. For you wear it as a badge of honor. Look, the only people that are honored by such actions of benightedness, are other men. I can assure you that the Creator the Most High God and Father is not, and neither am I impressed, nor am I persuaded to please the eyes and ears of men to satiate the selfish ego. For the Father is never proud or happy with anyone who elects to go to war and make war with the Administrators of the prodigal estate. Those administrators are following their lawfully ordained mandate (Romans 13:1-7) to administrate those who have not YET returned to the senses of their own court of conscious, and started to self-govern according to Equity. Such a deed is accomplished in direct connection with the Maxim of Equity, “Equity sees that as done what ought to be done.” This is when the Son and Heir is no longer of the prodigal estate, but of the Estate of the Father in Equity keeping and honoring Romans 13:8-10. This is the difference between the Old and the New.
 
Let me show you what the folly of the LAW ABSENT EQUITY is, and why it is repugnant to the Will of the Father.
 
Are you aware that in Gibson’s Suits in Chancery he wrote,
001 | Equity Is Everything Even WITHOUT the Law
Do you recognize the magnitude of this principal? I can see from many posts that the majority of you do not. For if you did, you not be boasting about your AT WAR escapades, and further, even be proud of them. Those escapade would be repugnant to you as they are repugnant to Equity if you would consider for a moment these following thoughts.
 

Do you think that this has something to do with the fact of Psalm 98:9 wherein it is proclaimed that the Most High Creator God and Father does not judge the people with THE LAW, but judges the people with Equity? Have you even consider what this means and the ramifications of it?

068 | Psalm 98v9

 
Well, if the Creator and Father is using Equity and not the Law, why are you using the law at all, in any form and/or format? Furthermore, it does not matter what law form it is. The 10 commandments, the Statutes at Large, Codes, Rules, Regulations, of the United States, case law, and of course International Law and Treaty such as the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)…..you name it. If it is of ANY law form, and that law form is absent Equity then, “Those who live by the sword shall die by the sword.” (Matthew 26:52) Peter was ready to bring the law. However, Equity demands that the peacemaker sheath the law. In other words, those who live by the Law Absent Equity, shall die by the Law Absent Equity. In other words, without any consideration for mercy, forgiveness, and justice. Simply put the law alone is ABSENT RIGHTEOUSNESS, and it does not allow for the correction of a mistake. Now, why would any one with commonsense want to be involved in anything like that?
 
Therefore, it most certainly goes without saying, but I will say it anyway for the record, that Equity alone can DO what the law can NEVER DO alone. Or, would you disagree with the Father’s Will and His Way of Equity? Tell me again, how do you plan to be revested with your Birthright Inheritance and Estate WITHOUT going thru Equity and yourself being IN and OF Equity to make a righteous claim as a Joint Heir WITH the Heir of ALL things? I may have more to say on this in another blog at another time.
069 | Equity alone can DO what the law can NEVER DO alone v2
 
Perhaps the reason why the Creator Most High God and Father never uses the law to judge the people is because, no one has ever been justified by the law (Galatians 3:11); and, I will add that no one will ever be justified by the law, no matter what the law form is that is being played with.
 
Again, why would you then elect/choose/volunteer to use the law in any form, for anything that you want to accomplish? By now, it should make absolutely no sense to engage this kind of deed. For without Equity, how does one using the law absent equity, plan to bring in justice, mercy, and forgiveness? Know ye not that the Law Absent Equity has no such qualities for such provisions and considerations? Perhaps this is why so many people have gotten “railroaded,” as they would claim, in so many court rooms…so-called Courts of Law, yes? Its got to be rough when using the law absent equity all when one is seeking relief, which can only be provided IN and thru Equity. So then, how is seeking Relief, Recourse and Redress by the law absent equity not commingling the PUBLIC with the PRIVATE and automatically committing adultery? News Flash: Adultery of the sexual kind is only meant for elementary understanding. It is not for the self-governing beloved Son and Heir as the Son and Heir does not willfully and negligently engage in such unloving deeds knowing that it violates the command to, “Love one another as I have loved you,” expounded and expressed in the second of the two greatest commandments to, “Love your neighbor as your self.”
 
Do you really think that you can achieve RELIEF from recourse for redress from the Law absent Equity? Do not be so benighted! The law alone and absent Equity is in fact, a death sentence, for it is purposed to govern the world of the dead, the estate of the prodigal son, and it is Equity in its negative form. Do not be fooled by such folly as to think you can find a way around this because, you can not. The administrators of the AT LAW, AT WAR, NEGATIVE EQUITY system will absolutely never allow for this, and that is in fact, their duty!
 
Since the Creator Most High God and Father does not use the law alone, then why are you? Why would anyone voluntarily elect to go against the Will (Equity) of the Father, and still hope to remain an Heir of that Will? Really, do you still think that you can be revested with the inheritance already promised and given by going against the Will of the one who gave the inheritance in the first place?
 
Moreover, if you are using some form of LAW ABSENT EQUITY, and since ALL law is NEGATIVE EQUITY because it intended to govern those AT WAR in and with the ways of the COMMERCIAL WORLD OF THE DEAD, commerce; then, how exactly to you propose to fool the one who has bequeathed unto you your inheritance if you are not following His Will as He has commanded is necessary of the Heir? Is not the Maxim of Law correct that, “God makes the Heir, not man?” Or, do your oppose this maxim? How could anyone with commonsense oppose such a maxim and be assured they will stand justified?
 
The law alone is indeed a double edged sword that cuts both ways. It cuts both its user, as well as the one that the law is being used against.
 
Why?
 
Because, 070 | The law is incomplete at its best without Equity
For it is Equity that brings in righteousness, which is justice, not the law. In other words, without Equity the law cannot and will not have anything to do with justice, because all law can be manipulated to serve the purpose of the one writing that law for their advantage at the expense of all others.
 
Why?
 
The law was given for only one purpose…because of transgressions, and for no other reasons and/or purpose. IT WAS ADDED! (Galatians 3:19) Meaning, that there was a time when the Law was not present, and there was ONLY Equity! So then, why was law added? It was added so that mankind would become aware of existence of Equity without Law by and through the administration of its NEGATIVE FORM. All so-called law courts are dealing in negative equity, no exceptions other than one for the original exclusive jurisdiction of a Court of Chancery. So then, for those of you that think you can be revested with your Birthright Inheritance and Estate thru a Probate Court of Law…..well…..that’s not me you hear laughing at you, but your own folly being reflected by the deeds you are doing in benightedness, and to make matters worse, it is being done in four part harmony. (Really, you do not know what the lyrics are that they are singing.)
 
Equity is the Will and Way of the Creator and Father the Most High God. That means Equity alone, without the aid of any law, can and does bring all the things that one is seeking for Relief on its own. Furthermore, Equity is the only way to administrate Trusts of the PRIVATE nature; not, of the public pseudo kind. Those fictions are all under the law of men, and are administrated by same. There is no other honorable and righteous way to administrate a private trust other than with Equity. If by chance you say otherwise, then the trust that you speak of is not private, but public, and can indeed be breached by the public at any time. Such a thing will never happen in Equity.
 
So then, why are so many of you so proud of your law based status? Have you even looked at the word status? Seriously?! If you had you will never-ever use that word again in relation to you, a living soul.
 

The Heir (Joint Heir/Co Heir WITH the Heir of ALL things, Christ) is with the superior claim for ALL things, no exceptions. For the Heir’s claim is IN and OF Equity because, Equity conforms to the Will of the Father, and is of the Mind of Christ, which is NOT CONFORMING unto the world, and the ways of this world, which all are in need of outside administration by the law.

071 | 1 John 5v14-15.jpg

A so-called Secured Party Creditor (SPC) is with an inferior claim to any and all claim’s proclaim by an Heir. Furthermore, even the Beneficiary is less than the Heir; but still, is greater than any Secured Party Creditor, and any claim that the Secured Party Creditor can bring, which could only be brought as a mere Qualified Heir, and not AS Heir. Plainly, the SPC is in the world of debt and dealing in debt; and therefore, is AT WAR. So then, why would one be so proud to have obtained what only amounts to as a work and deed of the flesh? Do you think that the Most High God and Father the Creator will honor the claim of a Secured Party Creditor to be revested with the God-given Birthright Inheritance and Estate, rather than the beloved Son and Heir? What part of the inheritance does a SPC have a right too inherit along with beloved Son and Heir? I tell you the truth when I say unto ye that you cannot be BOTH at the same time as that is of a double mind. In other words, how will the son of the bondwoman inherit with the Son of the freewoman? Tell me again, why and how so proud to have that SPC status?

072 | Galatians 4v30-31

So then, is the coveted and highly sought after SPC status of the bondwoman really so precious, or does one wish to be as the Son of the freewoman; the righteous Heir?

Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law?
You who are proud of your standing in commerce, why are you proud of being AT WAR? Know ye not that ALL COMMERCE IS WAR, and that ALL MONEY IS DEBT? Yes, you can DEMAND LAWFUL MONEY and hope that will redeem that currency. However, that currency is still the property of some other estate, and IF ye wish to be recognized as Joint Heir WITH the Heir of ALL things, then one cannot ignore the fact that property is FOREIGN to the Heir and His Natural-born God-given Birthright Inheritance and Estate. Why would you even consider touching it much less hoping it can be redeemed without revealing that one is with a double mind? Even if one does demand lawful money saying that the use of that property is under the doctrine of necessity, this does not change the fact that in so doing you have indeed volunteered and elected to be subject UNDER the owner of that property (Caesar) AS SURETY in direct violation of the maxim of Equity, “Equity will not aid a volunteer.”

073 | Proverbs 17v18 & 22v26
IF one mistakenly volunteered to be surety for the debt of another, then how are you not under their administration of you and your life? Or, do you disagree with, “No man can serve two masters?”

Don’t you think it is about time to seek the Equitable Solution and Path that is narrow, and that ends at the strait gate? Are you still so proud of achieving your commercial status? If so, then you must be absolutely be content to remain as a mere citizen of the lower Estate of the Prodigal Son. For that achievement is only of the world of the flesh, and it is conclusive that, “The flesh profits nothing.”
 
Oh prodigal son, when are you going to return to your senses, and seek to do, and live, a life in and of Equity ONLY?
Advertisements
Comments
  1. amg consulting says:

    a brick and morter “court” is a bank, river bank of the river styx. Their legislative courts are only for persons/vessels/agencies on the sea of commerce as they have plenary rule over interestate commerce. one should only enter their legislative, river banks if forced to do so if you are not able to conduct proper “court” via paperwork; if that is not successful you go ONLY to challenge jurisdiction of their federal trade union, as you do not want one of their police “cruisers” to sail on up and place you in the brig as that would be dishonorable. if forced through duress and coercion, to enter their bank, once there, one should demand cause why their private citizen, substantive rights should be commingled with enemy belligerents and be it resolved that this move forward private and sealed excluding the public if need be.

    just make sure that they know you are NOT the trustee for their estate, you are there in a non-representative capacity, a minister in Christ, as no trust shall fail for want of a trustee, but you are not it; remember, once you admit or form a controversy, you entrust them to form a trust the bankers and pharisees will be looking to laugh all the way to their other bank.

    • BULLSEYE!
      If one is forced in their corporate sanctuary (Court), whatever is done in there can be abated, negatively averred, and demurred. That case can be sealed from the public so as to protect the public from the private exclusive jurisdiction of an Equity court that one will be able to seek Relief in, and demand suborgation from the suretyship that public officials forced upon them against his/her will. For it is impossible for anyone to be a trustee for men and their laws absent equity, and a trustee for the Most High Creator and Father IN Equity because, no man can serve two masters, and Equity will not aid a volunteer.

      If one is going to be private, then they most certainly do have a duty to protect the public. If one is going to be self-governing, then they must do everything in their power to never interfere with the administrators administration of the public, and thereby keep the peace. For the administrators duty is to administrate the public, and those in and of the public. For the private people, it is your duty to self-govern so that the administrators do not have to govern you from the outside so that peace can be maintained.

      In order for this to take place correctly and honorably one can not be AT WAR with the administrators no matter how much one may dislike any political party, platform, or policies. In other words, one that wishes to be known as a peacemaker in and of the private and self-governing, cannot posture themselves in an AT WAR fashion against the public administrators for any reason whatsoever. For the public administrators are indeed doing what they are supposed to be doing according to their ordination to what they do as written in Romans 13:1-7. And, exactly what is it that the administrators are supposed to be doing? Testing to see if the prodigal son has changed their mind about their rebellion against The Will and Way of the Father, and is now conforming unto Romans 13:8-10.

      So then, what is done in and of the public is off-limits. In other words, if one is going to be truly in and of the private, then what takes place in and of the public, and/or how the public is administrated, is truly none-of-your-business. So then, do not make it your business, but rather remain in and of the private, and about the Father’s business. This is what the peacemaker, the beloved Son and Heir of God in Christ does and is doing.

  2. iamthelight0 says:

    How does that help to close the minor account? You create the order from your court and send it to trustees or administrators? Expressing the trust on record so bringing in to the county registrar your expressed trust so it’s now public having been recorded Then notice could be given an special appearance made if there was any court issues that needed to be say turned to an equity court from an law court? For at law the beneficiary has no rights. The trustee doesn’t even have to divulge it exist. So then how is there system changed to show the heir ? The recording at the register where the deeds are known? Then one would also acknowledge the deed so it’s properly recorded. One must state what venue they are in is what you are saying. Rebut any presumptions.

    • Start at the beginning. If one is involved in a covenant (Trust) relationship (femme covert) of any kind, and/or was subjected to such a relationship unwittingly, and they no longer desire to be involved in that Trust, for whatever the reason(s) may be. How can one bring about a lawful end to that relationship? Remember, we are bound by our Word, and our Word has indeed bound us on this Earth, and in Heaven. In other words, notice has been taken on this Earth, as it is in Heaven, to whom and where we have lodged our Trust in relation to, “No man can serve two masters.”

  3. Adam Beck says:

    Here again, and not to demean, but the word of God is not about how to interface in this world but to be forever free of it. God does not judge, His law does. The laws of Life or the Cosmic laws are what govern Life. One either adheres to the laws or does not. Is it God that judges and punishes a man if he jumps off a cliff 100 feet high and his body broken? The long and short, we either obey the laws of Life or we don’t.

    Men are subject to the laws of men because of how men identify themselves.

    Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada (Director of Investigation and Research, Restrictive Trade Practices Commission) [1990] 1 SCR 425 my pg. 167 and 168 “While individuals as a rule have full legal capacity by the operation of law alone, artificial persons are creatures of the state and enjoy civil rights and powers only upon the approval of statutory authorities”. The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen (N/A, my emphasis). He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the State or to his neighbors to divulge his business………… He owes no such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution”. (Underline for emphasis)

    Meaning of citizen, driver, tenant, joint tenant, lessee, incorporated inhabitant, owner, beneficial owner, taxpayer, employee, officer, resident, ratepayer, subject, purchaser, buyer, etc., etc. Each and every one, as per Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada, fall under the category of “and other artificial entities”; are legal persons, creatures of the state that enjoy rights and powers upon approval of statutory authorities. So there you have it. If you designate yourself a legal person or allow some other to make that determination for you, remain silent, then you are doomed.

    Here is the benefit and joy of being a citizen of Canada

    Citizenship Act R.S.C., 1985, c. C-29

    Persons who are citizens
    3 (1) Subject to this Act, a person is a citizen if
    (a) the person was born in Canada after February 14, 1977;

    Rights and obligations
    6 A citizen, whether or not born in Canada, is entitled to all rights, powers and privileges and is subject to all obligations, duties and liabilities to which a person who is a citizen under paragraph 3(1)(a) is entitled or subject and has a like status to that of such person. 1974-75-76, c. 108, s. 5.

    Citizenship is not a right but a privilege: Dowhopoluk v. Martin et al. [pg. 2]

    Supreme Court of Canada Re: Authority of Parliament in relation to the Upper House, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 54: 1979-12-21: “Further, although s. 91(1) gave the Queen the power, with the advice and consent of the Senate and the House of Commons, to alter the “Constitution of Canada” except in certain expressly designated areas, it does not confer a power to amend the B.N.A. Act. The word “Canada” in s. 91(1) does not refer to Canada as a geographical unit but refers to the juristic federal unit”.

    I am not a person who was born in a juristic federal unit.

    So liberty begins knowing as an individual you have full legal capacity. Not under legal constraint. Whereas, if an individual accepts the designation of a legal person, he is for all intents and purposes, an artificial person, a creature of the state enjoying civil rights and powers only upon the approval of statutory authorities. It would be wise for a man to make sure his capacity as part of any process he takes or he may be considered a creature of the state, a servant of the state, not free, and no thing he attempts will net success. There is no authority but you that another may designate you a legal person. Legal persons exist in Wonderland. Canada like the U.S.A. are Wonderlands.

    • Within the very first paragraph there is a contradiction that is absolutely glaring that reveals why one who is opposed to Equity and Trusts is not ready for the duties, obligations and responsibilities of Self-Governance.

      “As regards the first set of dangers, it behooves us to remember that men can never escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others. If for lawlessness or fickleness, from folly or self-indulgence, they refuse to govern themselves, then most assuredly in the end they will have to be governed from the outside. They can prevent the need of government from without only by showing that they possess the power of government from within. A sovereign cannot make excuses for his failures; a sovereign must accept the responsibility for the exercise of the power that inheres in him; and where, as is true in our Republic, the people are sovereign, then the people must show a sober under standing and a sane and steadfast purpose if they are to preserve that orderly liberty upon which as a foundation every republic must rest.”
      President Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt, Jamestown Exposition opening speech, April 26 of 1907, 21st paragraph

      Again, the only reason for one to be govern by other men is because one has willfully and negligently rejected Equity in favor of Law Absent Equity. This blog is not about law absent equity, but is about the maxim of law, “Equity IS King.”

      The Author of this blog does not endorse, or support any proposition that puts the law absent equity in good light. For to be a proponent of law absent equity really is to be in direct rebellion against the one that gifted the prodigal sons, all mankind, with everything they need for life and Godliness so that they can become the beloved adopted Sons and Heirs being grafted back into the First and Highest Estate, our first love. How any man can elect to remain benighted concerning this reveals a remarkable capacity of the same nature and cause that kept Israel in the Land of Goshen for 430 years. Do you really want to be like them? Or, do you want to learn the lessons of the past so that you do not have to repeat them?

  4. coubitbank says:

    A court of equity appears to be an oxymoron.

    And it could be said that equity knows no law

    If one claims lawful money under the code one is making use on said code and therefore the maxim.. he who gets the benefit suffers the burden (of the remainder of the code)

    If one claims under INCUN 1454 B5 to be an heir he also suffers the burden.

    Appreciate your mind jogging posts. Thank you

    • What is a “court”? Who creates the “court?” Why are people still looking for a “court,” instead of creating one? Consider for a moment why one would search for a “court” OUTSIDE of oneself (e.g. like what one see advertised in the phone book. They may even have a sign and/or placard, or a shingle outside the building with the word, “COURT” on it)… If it does, I can assure you THAT kind of court can only give “equity” in the NEGATIVE FORM. Why? Because, that kind of court IS NOT the source of EQUITY. Therefore, they are not authorized and/or ordained to give Equity, for their venue and jurisdiction is for COMMERCE only, and since all commerce is war, there can be no Equity given in any commercial court of commerce.

      If one is IN and OF Equity, seeking to always keep and obey the Will of the Father, then do they not have their own court? Is not their own Court from WITHIN? In other words, is it not a Court of Conscious? If so, then is not that court an Equity Court?

      An Equity Court does not necessarily have take place and/or occur in a brick and mortar building. However, it can…IF it is necessary for it too. Now, if it does, then it up to the one who is in Equity to BRING THEIR COURT WITH THEM and clearly state what the jurisdiction is for their Court at the very beginning. (On paper, or verbal, it matters not). In other words, the one IN Equity creates the Court rebutting all presumptions that one is looking for any kind of statutory and/or law form based court.

      If one does not proclaim from whence they are from, and to whom they are under orders from according to the covenant they have enter into, then is it not lawful for those of their own court, venue and jurisdiction, to automatically assume, and then conclude, that one is volunteering to be IN and OF their jurisdiction?

      A Court of Equity is a private court and its records are always sealed from the public so as not to trespass and/or allow for the mistake of commingling the two.

      Thank you, coubitbank, for sharing your thoughts.

    • Good discussion on Heir, vs Beneficiary and SPC. The default relationship in law is General Partnership where all parties are equally liable for the liabilities and obligations to any other person of the (presumed) General Partnership. There is also the default ‘election’ arising from the issuance of a Social Security Number account (which requires a Birth Certificate w\ the SS5). The election results in the presumption of ‘residence’ in the District of Columbia as evidenced by the counter election to Termination the Election of a non-resident alien being treated in like manner as a resident of the United States [Title 26 §6013(g)].

      The larger stub, to which the SSN card is attached, reads on its face, “Keep this stub with your personal records. The other side contains important information” with the reverse side [grammatically clever] states the status is ‘an alien’. It is incumbent on the Man (of either gender) to properly express and record, by act and deed, his/her proper capacity ex. rel. the infant decedent (dead) fiction Agency created by any Agency of the corporate body politic.

      • The law, no matter the form, can only provide remedy, which is its weakness, and why it was found to be lacking, as that weakness always results in one being the surety of a constructive Trust. Therefore, it will always come up short, as in, “Missing the mark.” It can never-ever provide Relief thru Recourse and/or Redress. That character and quality is exclusive to Equity alone, or when Equity is brought in to balance any certain specific law form with what it naturally does not have on its own, justice, mercy and forgiveness.

        It is very important to note that for those still trying to be revested with their God-given Birthright Inheritance Estate that, “God makes the Heir, not man.” Therefore, God is the one who rightfully determines what the Heir will be and conform to as that is well within, “His good pleasure,” as Creator, Father and Settlor. (All arguments opposed are frivolous and irrelevant). For it is His Will and it appears that men simply just do not want to conform unto it, but rather want to still do things their way, attempting to find another way thru some foreign based law form. For example, how to affect the civil death and righteously put to end the suretyship of the current Trust wherein one is married to Uncle Sam.

        It is remarkable the amount of misconstruing that is done when rebuke and chastisement is given with an intent not to destroy but, rather to admonish of the dereliction of duty, obligation and responsibility that the Father has every right to require of the beloved Son and Heir WITH all Co-Heirs. Far to many still wish to paddle around in the oceans upon oceans of law not taking close note of the fact that, “The Law was ADDED because of transgressions,” and how to apply that to all things. In other words, the law was not originally there and in place at all. The law was established because of doing things against the Will and Way of the Father. So then, it is only of commonsense to conclude that in order to return to that coverture of the Will and Way of the Father, one will have to CHANGE THEIR MIND about the importance and necessity of law in all of its forms.

        For the law no matter the form is completely immersed in negative equity as those still making a use of it still have need of being, “…under governors and tutors,” at least for a while longer, until they reveal that they have indeed reached, “…the time appointed by the Father,” and have undertaken the duties, obligations and responsibilities that He has determine befitting of His adopted Sons. Those governors and tutors, the ordained administrators of Romans 13:1-7 can ONLY administrate in negative equity and never Equity itself. It is up to the one IN and OF Equity to bring their Equity Court whenever and wherever it is needed for the sake of righteousness, justice, mercy and forgiveness.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s