The Foundation That Fulfills Expression

Posted: Friday, April 27, 2018 in Born Without Money


A while back, I created and shared the above meme.

Just last night, I discovered that another poster on FACEBOOK® who had posted this meme to her FACEBOOK® page, which is a very nice and kind act and deed. One of the comments posted about this meme is as follows:

“If whomever wrote this would understand what is Jobbery, they’d have a better understanding,”  posted by Joe BUCK.  My reply of that criticism is somewhat shorter than the longer version post herein below.


• Corruption among public officials.
• (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) the practice of making private profit out of a public office; corruption or graft
• the carrying on of public or official business for the sake of improper private gain.
• gobs; small pieces of work collectively.

Jobbery has nothing to do with the “Ultimate Gift,” for such a doing is of the traditions of men, and thus has nothing to do with with the return of a wayward soul found to be pleasing in the Creator-God sight complying with His Will as a, “Peacemaker.”

Preterism (foundation)
Equity (that which FULFILLS and thus takes away the law and its penalty)
Trust (expresses one’s allegiance)
“The Ultimate Gift.”
(The return of the once prodigal son in compliance with the Will of the Testator and thereby conforming to the mind and heart of the anointed, as all Co-Heir’s are required to by the Will of the Testator, just the same as the appointed Heir of ALL things was subjected. This is how one is released from edict for being governed by other men through the outside source of the governing-administrations of men. Once one has been found to be “trustworthy” of the Ultimate Gift, then it will be recognized and accepted by the administrations of men that is can indeed Self-Govern from with from being in Christ.

This is why “MAN,” (both male and female) who is, “Born of a woman, born under the law,” absent of pure unadulterated Equity (the Administration of the First and Highest Estate of Heaven above) is the subject of another man as their king.

For the failure (mistake) of expressing one’s Trust fails to make one’s, “Call and election sure.” To express wherein one has indeed placed their trust by their-own volition, voluntarily, is to effectively elect their Creator-God and Father through the finished work of the beloved Son AS their King and God. This is how one is found to be “trustworthy” of the worthiness one was bestowed with the day they were born of water through the canal of their Mother. Israel made the very same mistake and that is memorialized in 1 Samuel 8.

The very same problem still exists even unto today. This condition, state, and status is the default and no one has ever been exempt from it. However, one is intended to learn what they need to do and appropriately correct the mistake of allowing another man to be their king by default. This is how one ascends and transfigures from being mere MAN, unto becoming a Son of Man. This is how one comes out of her, and being under the jurisdiction of the Old Covenant and into the New Covenant of Trust, as the New Covenant IS in fact, a Trust!

For there are three is there not? These three are one, are they not? Creator-Most-High-God-Abba-Father as Creator-Grantor-Settlor-Trustor. The first of the firstfruits, the Beloved Son in who the Father is well pleased, as thee appointed Heir and Beneficiary of ALL things, who is the Redeemer of all mankind and of all creation. (“For all things have been created by Him and are for Him”). Those of mankind who ascend and transfigure to become Sons of Man, as bondservant-Trustees intrusted with stewardship AS embassadors for Christ, and Royal Priest of the High Priest of the Order of Melchizedek.

Yes, this does indicate a lot of duties, obligations and responsibilities. But, what else is a TRUSTED wife? Is she not a Trustee who has been intrusted with the Trust of Her Husband? Or, is the clay going to tell the potter He’s made a mistake and doesn’t know what he is doing? (Roman 9: 14-21 — Good luck with that. Let me know how that works out for ya.) Indeed, these three are One IN TRUST, IN Christ, and IN the Father. Who would dare to say that they are not? What part of a Trust does one not recognize and understand here? Why can one not see the Trust that it is?

However, the most important question for this line of thought is, “What is the proper and correct way to Express such a Trust so that all the kings and princes of THIS WORLD know not to touch one of the anointed, and how does one properly and correctly prepare for such a separation?” Have you ever consider that thought? Or, is one just reliant upon the corporation church for salvation and the manifestation of their inheritance? Know ye not that a church has not been, nor ever shall be of the ecclesia? One should know and be fully are of that very-very important difference. If not, then why does one not know and understand this difference? Such a difference is massively critical! So then, what part can a church (religious organization) have with one’s redemption, salvation and inheritance since it is IN and OF THIS WORLD of the dead? Do not the dead know nothing? Have you ever hear of that saying? So then, how can the dead be an Heir of anything, much less a co-Heir with the appointed Heir of ALL things?

Church = administrated all under the old covenant AS a dead entity CORPORATION in and of the PUBLIC, the COMMON, and the PROFANE. There is no Life in such an Entity for it perpetuates debtors, sureties and trustee’s to voluntarily be responsible for debts they have no business ever being involved with, much less touch.

Ecclesia = the very “‘Body Politic’ / ‘Wife’ of Christ,” is private, sacred, and very special, is administrated with pure unadulterated equity and not law that no one can ever be justified by as PUBLIC DEBTORS are adjudged; therefore, because the body of Christ is IN and OF the Living having Life is Eternal it is forever blessed and a private, sacred and very special possession as anointed and judged by the Testator of the Will. What part of being a possession of the Creator-God could one possibly not like and still remain to be seen and known as reasonable and sane?

With such a special distinction one has a hedge around them announcing by credential that all men are forbidden to govern and administration this private-special and sacred one, under the rule of bankruptcy, as well as touching them in any way, shape, or form. For the one co-heir WITH the appointed Heir of all things is bound to a higher Master and Order than any statutory jurisdiction that mankind has ever come up with including that of the common law which is just as absent of equity as all of the statutory codes, rules, and regulations.

Now, why would anyone attempt to separate themselves from the administration of men using the very rules, laws, regulations, statutes, codes, acts, treaties, and the like, that are conceived, created and issued from the world of the dead?

Let me put this another way, since all the laws of men are absent of equity, and thus administrate only matters of THIS WORLD, the world of the dead, then how could anyone ever use said laws to free themselves from the world of the dead and on into Life?

Would that not be an impossibility?

How can one who is IN and OF the world of the dead, use the things IN and OF the world of the dead, and limited by same, to remove themselves from the world of the dead?

Does it seem more plausible to use something that is NOT of the world of the dead to accomplish that?

One last thought for your consideration. Can anyone here breath life into a dead CORPS three days past?  If you can, you might very well be the Creator-God. But, what if you cannot? Now what? In whom are you going to place your Trust and how are you going to make that an official record to use to prove that one is ready to be released from administration of the world of the dead? Do you see folks that the expression of Trust is one of the biggest keys missing from their understanding of Redemption unto salvation that the corporation churches never-ever touch? Now, why is that?

Jobbery has everything to do with the world of the dead and all infant-decedents, “Born of a woman, born under the law.” For if one never learns how to, “Come out of her,” (Her = the traditions, customs and rituals of Babylon, Egypt and Rome) one is destined to remain under the rules of bankruptcy, administrated by governments of men without recourse for redress and relief. This folks… simply is, “The Order of Things,” and it is completely non-negotiable by the edict of the Testator of the Will. So, do not get mad, or be mad at me. I am not the Testator of the Will. Take all your grievances to the Testator. You tell Him what you think He has done wrong, or how He has wronged you. And, if you can speak about that experience, let us know how that works out for you.

Consider Romans 13:1-7 (especially verses 3 and 4)
1. Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God.
2. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves.
3. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same.
4. For he is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.
5. Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience’ sake.
6. For because of this you also pay taxes, for they are God’s ministers attending continually to this very thing.
7. Render therefore to all their due: taxes to whom taxes are due, customs to whom customs, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor.

concerning the matter in his opening speech at the Jamestown Exposition given April 26 of 1907, 21st paragraph:

“As regards the first set of dangers, it behooves us to remember that men can never escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others. If from lawlessness or fickleness, from folly or self-indulgence, they refuse to govern themselves, then most assuredly in the end they will have to be governed from the outside. They can prevent the need of government from without only by showing that they possess the power of government from within. A sovereign can not make excuses for his failures; a sovereign must accept the responsibility for the exercise of the power that inheres in him; and where, as is true in our Republic, the people are sovereign, then the people must show a sober under standing and a sane and steadfast purpose if they are to preserve that orderly liberty upon which as a foundation every republic must rest.”

Now, since it is true that, “No man can serve two masters,” then IF one is only going to serve their Creator-God the Most High Abba-Father (the one who created and gives one their inheritance) through His One and Only Appointed Heir of ALL things, as a Joint Heir/Co-Heir WITH the appointed Heir, then why would one trouble themselves the on going shenanigans of an administration that is foreign to them? (NOTICE: it is foreign, but not alien. For ALL start out under that foreign jurisdiction, “Born of a woman, born under the law.” That law being completely ABSENT of equity.)

Yes, that administration, which is called a “government,” is in fact ORDAINED by the Creator-God to do exactly what it is doing. Therefore, such an administration is in fact a part of the One Government doing its designed and ordained duty to aid in the correction of the wayward prodigal sons for the purpose of helping one to find, know and understand exactly why repentance is necessary, and how by and through such a Deed, one will reunite one not only with the Creator-God and Father, but also with their Birthright inheritance and Estate.

So then, I shall offer this for your consider, IF one so wills to even consider. How can any opposition to the governing administration set in place by the very Creator-God (Romans 13:1-2) as a resulting Trust for the hostile deeds of mankind engaging in the belligerent acts of buying and selling LEGAL TITLES, be righteously opposed, and the one so doing be found to be pleasing in the sight of the one that granted them their, “Life, liberty and pursuit of happiness,” not to mention their inheritance and estate?

I know, that’s a ginormous question. Well, the answer for it is just as ginormous and even bigger than ginormous.

Does it not now seem very foolish to be in opposition to the governing-administrations of men as the result of such a deed is in fact a stumbling block between one and their inheritance and estate? Can one now see why just peacefully leaving by the closing of all PUBLIC ACCOUNTS with that governing administration will result in one no longer being touched by that which is common and profane?

Now, since it is One Government, but two administration of that One Government, is it WISE to be directly opposed to the One Government which is upon the shoulders of the Prince of Peace, the very one and only appointed Heir of ALL things? Why would one risk their birthright inheritance and estate for such an unconscionable deed when ‘The Way’ of the Peacemaker settles all matters of a PUBLIC type?

For there IS no other way for one to be returned unto Self-Governance, as their is no only way for one’s Birthright Inheritance and the Estate to be returned them. For it is an ESTATE, and as an estate it was created by a Will and intended to be bequeathed to the heir when the heir COMPLIES with all the requirements of the Will, and not before.

One can witness the entire thread here @

  1. Scottie Marshall says:

    Has your views on the ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ as being an indemnification document changed?

    • Thank you for asking a question that is worthy of an answer. I can only hope that more would do such.

      The answer to you question is, “YES,” a great deal has changed since then that I am very thankful for in terms of knowledge, understanding and wisdom for one to return as the prodigal son is hoped for doing. Especially learning, knowing and understanding that indemnification is really about escaping one’s duties, obligations and responsibilities rather than recognizing, acknowledging and accepting them. For one is found to be “Trustworthy” and the other has not yet ascended into that acceptance yet, even though they also in honor of equity, “…have already been given everything they need for Life and Godliness,” just the same as all have been, just the same as all have already judged and deemed to be worthy the day they were, “Born of a woman, born under the law.”

      The question left unanswered from that point is will one prove themselves trustworthy of what they have already been judged? That’s a huge question because, the corporation churches do not teach that faith needs to be expressed as trust. How else is one going to prove the faith that they profess without an expression of Trust? Faith the evidence of things NOT SEEN, is it not? So then, how does one PROVE something that cannot be seen? Likewise, how does one prove Trust?

      When faith is without works it is deemed to be dead. Likewise, so also when Trust is without Deeds is it deemed to not exist, or a Trust can be Constructed and IMPLIED from the lac of expression; therefore, it is also dead. Remember how, “Silence is acquiesces?” If one does not express their faith AS Trust and that duty is left undone, what is the STATE OF NATIVITY supposed to do for the newborn offspring other than to IMPLY what that inaction means for the newborn offspring, “Born of a woman, born under the law?” Perhaps this is how all have entered into the WORLD OF THE DEAD, hm? So then, can one see how, “Faith without works is dead,” is no different than Trust without Deeds is dead?

      The New Covenant is a Covenant of Trust. Yes! A Trust. “These three are one!” In a Trust there are three. A Grantor or Trustor, who is the Giver and Creator. An appointed Heir who is the Beneficiary of ALL things given by the Creator of the Trust and appointed by same. Then there is the Trustee, or Trustees. In this case, let us just say that the title for that duty is, “Bondservant,” as one is bonded by the word of their expressed deed accepting all the duties, obligations and responsibilities of Trustee for the Trust, which is NOT a small matter in the least. Can this be proven? How can this be proven? Is one not to PROVE ALL THINGS? If one can prove Trust, then cannot one also prove faith? If one can indeed do such a thing, could this be HOW one can… “make their call and election sure,” and thus is found to be TRUSTWORTHY of their God-given birthright inheritance and estate? Can one see that this can be accomplished without any law, or any form that is absent of equity? Can one see how this can only be accomplished with the pure unadulterated equity of the New and Better Covenant that does not trespass into the rules, laws and regulations of the world of the dead?

      And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, has he given life together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses; blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross; and having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it. (Col 2:13-15) Is this how proves that they have OVERCOME the world of the dead through the One that triumphed over all the trials and tribulations THIS WORLD could challenge Him with? Is this the ONLY way for one to receive unto themselves Self-governance that is recognized by the governments of men? Is this the one and only strait and narrow path which at the end of it is the gate that few find?

      Indemnification seems like a long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, and it is the biggest gun, if you will, that the world of the dead can offer. In other words, it is the world of the dead best offer. But that offer still leaves one UNDER the rule and authority that Christ overcame spoiling their ability to make claims against Him and His Co-Heir’s as Qualified Heir’s. The corporation churches contribute to this folly with the distraction of teaching a 2nd coming future when absolutely everything was fulfilled in AD70. The destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem was not only the fulfillment of His promised 2nd coming, it was also the sign and PROOF that OLD COVENANT was finished, and the New Covenant was fully established in its place. Now, all that remains to be dwelt with is the minds of men that cannot see and understand clearly what has already transpired and been established. Now, here is the big 64-trillion dollar question (actually it is priceless) if one cannot do this, then how will one ever express their faith as Trust according to the Will of the Testator in the way and manner that is pleasing to Him, and honors Him and His purposes? Can one see how not recognizing how everything that was promised and fulfilled is of lack of faith and trust? Can one who does not see and understand this whether being blinded by their own benighted blindness and folly, or the corporation churches traditions, NOT be calling the Creator who promised all of these things coming to pass, a liar? Think about it! Some in the governments of men have plotted to keep men as their surety-slaves for their purposes. So then, why not also lie about the 2nd coming of Christ, which would also aid, abet and perpetuate that very same voluntary slavery while one still awaits a second coming future event that has already been fulfilled? Do you see how the lack of that knowledge and understanding keeps one blind to the truth that makes one free?

      So also do the Commerce/Commercial Guru’s who teach one how to be double minded by the mixing of the law of the statutory world of the dead with that of pure unadulterated equity. This is why there are those that have received something from government, UNDER CONTRACT, but have never been recognized to be free from their rule and God-ordained authority (Romans 13:1-7). Some that even received an amount from the government lost it entirely because they were STILL under contract being governed by the administrators of the bankrupt.

      On the other hand, Equity is the WILL and Way of the Creator, and it is how He has judged all of mankind. The Creator did not use law absent of equity of any form for His Judgment.y the way, that includes the Common Law, which many are fond of repeating that the Common Law is based upon God’s Law. It is based upon OLD COVENANT law, not the pure unadulterated equity of the New and Better Covenant. Therefore, one using such shall never find relief and rest from the administrators of the bankrupt.

      However, if one desires to be in the New and Better Covenant, then one will need to see and know the difference between the Old and New and likewise learn and know how to discern the two and keep the two separate, while also keeping themselves separated from the OLD in accordance with, “Come out of her, my people, that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues.” (Rev 18:4) For those still in Adam, “Born of a woman, born UNDER the law,” have not yet ascended into the Trustworthiness of being, “Born Again,” “Born from Above,” “Born anew,” and as a result of the lack of expression to prove wherein one has lodged their Trust, one must remain being UNDER law, and thus under the administration of administrators who shall govern them under the rule of bankruptcy. This is what former Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt was speaking of in his Jamestown Exposition speech that I have quoted a number of different times over the years.

      Being UNDER LAW is not for the sake of condemnation. CERTAINLY NOT! It is for the purpose and opportunity for one to prove their faith by their works. In other words, to prove their Trust by their Deeds. Until that is accomplished, one can be very, very grateful that GRACE is in the place of the Law… ALL LAW because, “No one is justified by the law.” (Galatians 3:10-12) No, not one! Yet, one does have a Redeemer that is the appointed Heir of all things (Heb 1:1-3) who did do and keep that impossibility. Why was keeping the law that is absent of equity impossible? Can one prove a negative? ALL law absent of equity is NEGATIVE. Since law absent of equity is negative it cannot be proven to be kept either, neither could it ever be kept without breaking it… except for only One, who lived Equity and thus FULFILLED ALL THE LAW and did not destroy it.

      This is why, “ALL in Adam die (Old Covenant) but, all in Christ are made alive (the New and Better Covenant).” One does not simply enter into that Covenant by going into a CORPORATION CHURCH, which by the way functions UNDER LAW, and is baptized under what that corporation churches traditions, customs and rituals and is thus found to be Trustworthy by the Creator-Yah Abba-Father through His Beloved Son in whom He is well pleased. Why? The “CHURCH” is NOT the “Ecclesia.” The two are completely different. One is OLD and the other is the established body in and of the New.

      “Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father who is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father who is in heaven.” (Matt 10:32-33) If ones does this properly and correctly then will the governments/administrations of men have power and authority over them to govern their life anymore? For there is only One Way, and that Way is well within the right of the Testator of the Will, the Creator, to determine according to that which He pleases. There is no other way. Therefore, His way simple is, “The Order of Things,” and indemnification does not figure into it at all but rather full and complete responsibility and liability for ALL things that one has done, or failed to do. Nothing else will please the Testator of the Will.

  2. amg consulting says:

    In God I Trust all things.

  3. iamthelight0 says:

    peaceful closing of account, how procedurally? Administratively? in chancery?

    • How does one lawfully and peacefully collapse an implied/constructive/resulting Trust?
      If the reason for an implied trust is the fact that a trust was never expressed, then what must be done firstly to establish that one no longer is in need of being governed from an outside source, so that when one expresses a New Trust, under a New Covenant, that said Express Trust will take very seriously and likewise recognized and accepted?

  4. Mark Mywords says:

    The thread for facebook link isn’t working, just so you know. You are very knowledgeable and express it in an manner which is entertaining, educational and direct. Thank you for your writings, and time (value) taken to help us will our way into the kingdom of heaven. Is the testator (whom I need to express my grievances about the MISTAKES that have been made), the registrar for births deaths and marriages D in the STATE (I live in AUSTRALIA)I was born by a woman under law?

    • Mark Mywords says:

      Don’t know how to edit above comment, but the D at the start of the second last line was meant to say department.

    • Thank you for your thanks.
      I do recognize and appreciate your words of kindness.

      Who is a maker of a Will?
      Is not a maker of a Will the Testator?
      When one was, “Born of a woman, born under the law,” was not one, “…given everything they need for life and godliness?”
      Who did that deed?
      Who bequeathed that gift to the newborn offspring and how was it paid for?

      If what was given to the newborn offspring was in the form of an Estate resulting from a Will, then what was done with that Estate to protect it for the newborn offspring’s eventual ascension to the Age of Majority?
      Whose responsibility/duty was it to keep it for the newborn offspring and prepare that offspring for the day when the offspring undertakes all responsibility for it?
      Is not an Estate held in Trust?
      Most importantly, which came first, the Spirit, or the Flesh?

      The answer to the last question is critical and everything hinges on it. For if one does not see and know the truth of this answer, then how will one know WHO gave them their Estate the day they were, “Born of a woman, born under the law,” with the potential and hope for one to be joined as Co-Heir with the appointed Heir of ALL things?

      Is not an Estate formed by the Will of a Testator?
      Did you form your-own Estate?
      If not, then who did?
      If so, then how in the world did you ever loose it?

      If one needs to know who the Testator is, and one is looking to men, their equal, then one might have a problem with recognizing and knowing who their Creator and Grantor is of their Estate. Perhaps Hebrews 9 might help. From all of my writings, especially of the past two years, it should be obvious for whom it is that I am speaking of when I refer to the Testator of the Will.